Has popular christianity forgotten the point of the Gospel?

From the title you may be thinking that this is an outrageous question, but I believe, to some extent, the answer is “yes.”

It is not the definition of the word “gospel,” which will be examined here, but rather what really makes the “Gospel” gospel—that is, “good news”. What the Gospel is cannot be questioned when looking earnestly at the Scriptures—it is the truth that “Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures,” (I Cor 15:3b-4 ESV). All the doctrines and gifts which constitute the gospel (such as the substitutionary atonement, justification, etc.) are often focused in on, and meditated on individually—and rightly so!—though sometimes this comes at the expense of missing the bigger picture. What actually makes the substitutionary atonement or justification “good news”?

The historical facts of Jesus death on the cross or even his resurrection from the grave are not, in themselves, good news. A key phrase in the Corinthians passage I quoted earlier is the three words. “for our sins.” “that Christ died for our sins…” I have previously taught in my Sunday-school class that what what makes the events of Good Friday and Easter “good news” is the fact that they were done “for our sins”; this is not entirely wrong, but I have come to understand that it falls short of the final answer. As we have done before, we must ask the question, “what makes this good news?” What makes the fact that Christ died for our sins good news? The answer to that is so elementary and obvious that it may seem that you have waisted 10 minutes of your life by reading this post, but I think that if most Christians are honest with themselves they will find that the simplicity of this truth may be the very reason it has not permeated our hearts.

The answer comes most clearly in I Peter 3:18, which says, “For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God” (ESV). Ultimately what the makes the Gospel good news is that it restores man’s relationship with his Creator! Reconciliation. The good of the gospel is found in God Himself! John Piper, in his book, God is the Gospel, makes this point and expounds it quite well. In the conclusion of the book Piper sums it up by saying,

“The point of this book is that the Christian gospel is not merely that Jesus died and rose again; and not merely that these events appease God’s wrath, forgive sin, and justify sinners; and not merely that this redemption gets us out of hell and into heaven; but that they bring us to the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ as our supreme, all-satisfying, and everlasting treasure” (John Piper, God is the Gospel 167).

While maybe no Christians would object to this notion, do we really live it out? When we think of the glory of the Gospel, do we think mostly of the flames we are missing, or the friends and loved ones we will be reunited with, or do we think of how glorious it will be to spend eternity with our Glorious, happy, God? Secondly, is this how we present the Gospel to others—as the good news of reconciliation to God!—or is it a get-out-of-Hell free card? Or is it our own version of “your best life now”?

In the sphere of evangelism I have seen this screwed up again and again (and have done it myself). I think that instead of starting our Gospel presentations at, “all have sinned, and sin separates you from God,” we should take a step back and present the glory of God, and why the lost should even care that they are separated from God!

This is illustrated quite well in Acts 17 as Paul speaks to the philosophers on Mars hill. Notice how as he begins his discourse in verses 22-23, he doesn’t immediately refer to the sin nature or our separation from God. Rather, he begins to expound God as the awesome creator and sustainer of the universe! It isn’t until verse 30 that he alludes to sin or repentance! Why would a lost person care about being separated from God if he doesn’t even know anything about Him or his glory?

I hope this has been a reminder of the simple truth that God is the ultimate goal of the gospel! I pray that we will make this obvious in our own hearts, as well as live it out practically as we present the Gospel!


9 thoughts on “Has popular christianity forgotten the point of the Gospel?

  1. Michael,

    I really like your blog. I agree that the gospel is the good news of Jesus death, burial, and resurrection for our sins. The motive behind each conversion is harder for me to judge. Jesus preached more on hell than any other preacher we know about in Scripture.

    John the Baptist warned the Pharisees, “Flee the wrath to come.” That is why I got saved. I did not want to go to hell. Are there false professions because of wrong motives? I am sure. I guess I will just keep preaching the gospel with the right motive and let God the Spirit convict of sin, righteousness, and judgment and trust that sinners will come with the right motive.

    Keep on blogin!

  2. Thanks for the answer Dr. White. That’s a good point… I know that my conversion was for the same reason (and probably the vast, vast majority of professing christians today.) It seems to be a stretch to take it as far as piper often does…. Thanks for reading.

  3. Great post!

    It seems like you and I had the same inkling to blog about the gospel now.

    Like I said in my post this morning, McLaren is all about global reconciliation as opposed to focusing on personal reconciliation. Both are indeed true without committing the mistake of ignoring the other.

    Great-looking blog!

  4. Pingback: The Gospel of Idolatry? « LetUsFollowHim

  5. Great post. Yeah we can’t claim to be Christians and live like were in guidepost! God as the awesome creator and sustainer of the universe! Can this be enough to sustain our passion for our faith? I think we’ve only scratched the surface in getting to know God! Through a glass darkly, but then face to face

    • “God as the awesome creator and sustainer of the universe! Can this be enough to sustain our passion for our faith?”

      I think you are getting at something I have thought/taught on before: the practical outworkings (such as sanctification) of preaching a ‘get out of hell free’ gospel, vs. the true gospel of reconciliation.

      When one is saved just to flee Hell, than he has already gained the goal of his salvation (not to say that he can’t be taught otherwise in the future). But when someone accepts Christ for reconciliation to God (because he wants relationship with Him), than salvation is just the starting line, rather than the breaking of the ribbon at the finnish. Sanctification will come much more naturally.

  6. Pingback: The Gospel of Idolatry? « Seeking The Superior

  7. I like what you said about changing where we start our gospel presentations. I had at same idea a while back while reading 1st John. The body of that epistle starts with describing God as light. It doesn’t start with a discussion on sin but rather a discourse on the holiness and grandeur of God. That was the first thing John tried to get across.

    • Thanks for the comment. Yeah I agree. There are examples of course in the New Testament where Jesus does not start at the glory of God in evangelism, but we have to keep in mind that he was dealing with people who already had a strongly theistic worldview, and were pretty well versed in the charicter of Yehweh from the Old Testament. For most that we will be talking to that is likely not the case.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s